How are costs apportioned in multi-party proceedings (Part 3)?
Check out our latest Bite Sized Legal Insights, where we explore the recent decision in Watson & Co Superannuation v Dixon Advisory [2024] FCA 386. This case sheds light on cost recovery after a class action carriage contest. Key takeaways include how courts oversee costs to be deducted from the settlement fund and what can be recovered by a party whose proceeding has been stayed.
How are costs apportioned in multi-party proceedings (Part 2)?
Last week, we touched on the basics of costs when a plaintiff has mixed success against multiple defendants. This week, we're exploring Sanderson and Bullock orders—legal tools that can shift the costs burden of multi-party proceedings in significant ways.
How are costs apportioned in multi-party proceedings? (Part 1)
Curious about how costs are shared in multi-party proceedings? Our latest Bite Sized Legal Insights article delves into the intriguing world of cost apportionment. This week, we'll break down the essentials including: different approaches to apportionment, the costs consequences of separate claims and defences, the costs consequences of mixed success against multiple defendants, and how to safeguard against costs incurred by co-defendants.